🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."