🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to restart atomic negotiations with Washington on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi declared solely negotiations was effective, and shared new appeals had been made by intermediaries to reopen talks with the US government. He said Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran was not yet able to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Path

The foreign minister is walking a challenging route since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be proceeding from a situation of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient defensively and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Talks Suddenly Concluded

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the American leader asserting the sites had been eliminated. Afterward, Western states employed their authority to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Diplomats claimed repeatedly they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Current Status

Iran's diplomats said the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the offer could be reintroduced in some form if discussions resume.

Trump in recent days claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to resume discussions, but in private Iran's diplomats state they are not yet getting clear proposals from America either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of passivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran states negotiations is not part of a show.

Negotiating Stance

In his remarks to the forum, designed to depict the US as a controlling nation that exploits the idea of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the 12-day war revealed the clash could not be ended by combat operations. He asserted the attacks began with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were carried out with complete American awareness and collaboration, making faith hard to restore.

Negotiations Remains the Final Answer

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had consistently attempted to enforce their demands during the talks. Diplomacy can still be viable and stays the primary answer to resolve disputes, but its criteria, rules and principles must be adhered to."

"In case they address to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of dignity and honor, they will obtain a response in the same approach."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is described by Iranian officials as the struggle of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We acquired numerous insights from this engagement; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He continued: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to obliterate, stays intact. The installations and machinery, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but failed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have become more resilient, more united, and more supportive of the administration and the state in the face of this assault."